When reading medium-sized files from a USB3 flash disk, the exFAT file system delivers up to 9% of performance improvements and the NTFSДЇile system delivers up to 5% of performance improvements over the FAT32 file system. Up to 4% of performance improvements over the normally used FAT32 file system while the NTFS file system drops 1% below. Improvements and the exFAT file system up to 2% of performance improvements over the normally used FAT32 file system.ДЇor users required to write medium-sized files to a USB3 flash disk, the situation changes and the exFAT file system takes the lead with Improvements and the exFAT file system up to 25% of performance improvements over the normally used FAT32 file system.ДЇor users required to read a large number of small files from a USB3 flash disk, the NTFS file system can deliver up to 10% of performance System delivers up to 7% of performance improvements over the normally used FAT32 file system.ДЇor users required to write a large number of small files to a USB3 flash disk, the NTFS file system can deliver up to 40% of performance Relative to the FAT32 file system performance, the NTFS file system delivers up to 19% of performance improvements and the exFAT file Of the FAT32 file system, which is by default used on all USB3 flash disks.ДЄccording to the average benchmark results, which shows a normalized average performance for all types of benchmarks for each file system Test 9 - File Delete Operations Test (20,000 Files, 4 GB of Data)Д«enchmark results from all USB3 flash disks using three different file systems were normalized and compared relative to the performance.Test 8 - Duplicate Files Search Test (20,000 Files, 4 GB of Data).Test 7 - Disk Space Analysis Test (20,000 Files, 4 GB of Data).Test 6 - Large Files Read From USB Disk Test (10 Files, 1 GB of Data).Test 5 - Large Files Write To USB Disk Test (10 Files, 1 GB of Data).Test 4 - Medium Files Read From USB Disk Test (100 Files, 1 GB of Data).Test 3 - Medium Files Write To USB Disk Test (100 Files, 1GB of Data).Test 2 - Small Files Read From USB Test (18,000 Files, 1 GB of Data).Test 1 - Small Files Write To USB Disk Test (18,000 Files, 1 GB of Data).Each USB3 disk for each file system has been tested using an identical set of benchmarks including:

Of analyzing disk space usage, classifying files, searching duplicate files, synchronizing files, copying files and deleting files using a number All tests were performed using DiskBoss v4.7.28, which is capable

USB3 Disk 2 - Transcend JetFlash 780 16GBДЄn identical set of tests has been performed on each USB3 flash disk three times and before each test USB3 disks were reformatted using the FAT32,Д®xFAT and NTFS file systems respectively.

USB3 Disk 1 - Silicon Power Blaze B20 16GB.Tested three different USB3 flash disks using a diversified set of benchmarks. Systems is more optimized for read operations and which one is more optimized for write operations? In order to answer these questions, we have Which of the available file systems is more optimized for small files and which one is more optimized for large files? Which of the available file But, is it an optimal file system to be used with modern USB3 flash disks? Normally, USB flash disks are sold formatted using the FAT32 file system. NTFS - an advanced, journaling file system.exFAT - a newer file system optimized for flash devices.FAT32 - a mature file system normally used on USB disks.Finally, in 2006 Microsoft added the exFATДЇile system, which is especially optimized for flash devices and resource constrained hardware configurations. Introduced the NTFS file system, which improved the performance and reliability of file operations. Is a mature file system, which is an improved version of the original FAT file system used in the MS DOS operating system.

In a Windows-based environment, USB flash disks may be formatted using three different file systems: FAT32, exFAT and NTFS.

Exfat vs ntfs